-
摘要随着我国民事诉讼由职权主义向当事人主义的转变, 人权保障、程序正义的理念逐步深入人心。非法证据排除规则成为人权保障和程序正义的应有之意。2002年4月1日起施行的《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》标志着我国民事诉讼中的非法证据排除规则和判断标准得以正式确立。但对非法证据排除规则的规定不够明确,内容也不全面,需要作进一步完善。文章在分析其不足之处的基础上, 借鉴国外有益的立法经验,提出完善我国民事诉讼非法证据排除规则的建议。9929
- 上一篇：网络对中学生思想政治教育的影响及对策
- 下一篇：我国民间借贷法律监管研究
关键词 非法证据 非法证据排除规则 民事诉讼
毕 业 论 文 外 文 摘 要
Title On the exclusive rules of illegal
evidence in Civil litigation
Abstract
The idea of guarantee of human rights and procedural justice is slowly filtering into people's minds while civil procedure has changed from the inquisitorial system to adversary system. Exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence has become connotation of guarantee of human rights and procedural just ice. Provisions concerning proofs of civil procedure released by supreme people. scourt has been put in force since April 1st, 2002,which symbols rule of eliminating illegal proofs and standards have established in our civil procedure in due form. However, provisions about the rule are not clear and overall yet, I think they need further perfection. The author analyses its defects and puts forward some suggestions on the improvement of exclusive rule of illegal evidence in our civil litigation.
Keywords illegal evidence exclusive rule of illegal evidence
civil litigation
目 录
1 绪论 1
2 非法证据排除规则的法理分析 2
2.1 相关基本概念理解 2
2.1.1 非法证据的界定 2
2.1.2 非法证据排除规则的内涵 3
2.2 非法证据排除规则的产生与发展 3
2.3 民事诉讼法中确立非法证据排除规则的理论基础 4
2.3.1 抑制违法取证行为 5
2.3.2 有利于文护程序正义 5
2.3.3 文护公民合法权益 6
3 对国外民事诉讼非法证据排除规则立法的考察 6
3.1 英美法系 7
3.2 大陆法系 8
3.3 外国民事诉讼非法证据排除规则的特点 9
4 我国民事诉讼非法证据排除规则的立法现状及评价 9
4.1 非法证据排除规则在我国民事诉讼中的立法沿革 9
4.2 对我国民事诉讼非法证据排除规则的评价 11
4.2.1 规定非法证据排除规则的法律文件效力层级过低 11
4.2.2 非法证据排除的标准抽象、不明确 11
4.2.3 非法证据的排除过于绝对化 12
5 完善我国民事诉讼非法证据排除规则的建议 13
5.1 明确实践中所要排除的“非法证据”的范围 13
5.2 进一步明确和细化非法证据排除的判断标准 13
5.3 明确民事诉讼中非法证据排除规则的例外 14
5.4 设置后果性的规定，建立权利救济程序 15
结论 15